Смекни!
smekni.com

Reason And Imagination Essay Research Paper According (стр. 2 из 4)

historians, Herodotus, Plutarch, Livy, were poets; and although the plan of

these writers, especially that of Livy, constrained them from developing this

faculty in its highest degree they make copious and ample amends for their

subjection, by filling all the interstices of their subjects with living images.

11

?68 Having determined what is poetry, and who are poets, let us proceed to

estimate its effects upon society.

12

?69 Poetry is ever accompanied with pleasure: all spirits on which it falls,

open themselves to receive the wisdom which is mingled with its delight. ?70 In

the infancy of the world, neither poets themselves nor their auditors are fully

aware of the excellency of poetry: for it acts in a divine and unapprehended

manner, beyond and above consciousness: and it is reserved for future

generations to contemplate and measure the mighty cause and effect in all the

strength and splendour of their union. ?71 Even in modern times, no living poet

ever arrived at the fulness of his fame; the jury which sits in judgement upon a

poet, belonging as he does to all time, must be composed of his peers: it must

be [[impanelled]] in pannelled by Time from the selectest of the wise of many

generations. ?72 A Poet is a nightingale who sits in darkness, and sings to

cheer its own solitude with sweet sounds; his auditors {{Sig. 4v}} are as men

entranced by the melody of an unseen musician, who feel that they are moved and

softened, yet know not whence or why. ?73 The poems of Homer and his

contemporaries were the delight of infant Greece; they were the elements of that

social system which is the column upon which all succeeding civilization has

reposed. ?74 Homer embodied the ideal perfection of his age in human character;

nor can we doubt that those who read his verses were awakened to an ambition of

becoming like to Achilles, Hector and Ulysses: the truth and beauty of

friendship, patriotism and persevering devotion to an object, were unveiled to

the depths in these immortal creations: the sentiments of the auditors must have

been refined and enlarged by a sympathy [[with]] which such great and lovely

impersonations until from admiring they imitated, and from imitation they

identified themselves with the objects of their admiration. ?75 Nor let it be

objected, that these characters are remote from moral perfection, and that they

can by no means be considered as edyfying paterns for general imitation. ?76

Every epoch under names more or less specious has deified its peculiar errors;

Revenge is the naked Idol of the worship of a semi barbarous age; and

self-deceit is the veiled Image of unknown evil before which luxury and satiety

lie prostrate. ?77 But a poet considers the vices of his contemporaries as the

temporary dress in which his creations must be arrayed, and which cover without

concealing the eternal proportions of their beauty. ?78 An epic or dramatic

personage is understood to wear them around his soul, as he may the antient

armour or the modern uniform around his body; whilst it is easy to conceive a

dress more graceful than either. ?79 The beauty of the internal nature cannot be

so far concealed by its accidental vesture, but that the spirit of its form

shall communicate itself to the very disguise; and indicate the shape it hides

from the manner in which it is worn. ?80 A majestic form, and graceful motions

will express themselves through the most barbarous and tasteless costume. ?81

Few poets of the highest class have chosen to exhibit the beauty of their

conceptions in its naked truth and splendour; and it is doubtful whether the

alloy of costume, habit etc. be not necessary to temper this planetary music for

mortal ears. {{Sig. 5r}}

13

?82 The whole objection however of the immorality of poetry rests upon a

misconception of the manner in which poetry acts to produce the moral

improvement of man. ?83 Ethical science arranges the elements which poetry has

created, and propounds schemes and proposes examples of civil and domestic life:

nor is it for want of admirable doctrines that men hate, and despise, and

censure, and deceive, and subjugate one another. ?84 But poetry acts in another

and a diviner manner. ?00 It awakens and enlarges the mind itself by rendering

it the receptacle of a thousand unapprehended combinations of thought. ?85

Poetry lifts the veil from the hidden beauty of the world; and makes familiar

objects be as if they were not familiar; it re-produces all that it represents,

and the impersonations clothed in its Elysian light stand thenceforward in the

minds of those who have once contemplated them, as memorials of that gentle and

exalted content which extends itself over all thoughts and actions with which it

co-exists. ?86 The great secret of morals is Love; or a going out of our own

nature, and an identification of ourselves with the beautiful which exists in

thought, action or person, not our own. ?87 A man to be greatly good, must

imagine in tensely and comprehensively; he must put himself in the place of

another and of many others; the pains and pleasures of his species must become

his own. ?88 The great instrument of moral good is the imagination: and poetry

administers to the effect by acting upon the cause. ?89 Poetry enlarges the

circumference of the imagination by replenishing it with thoughts of ever new

delight, which have the power of attracting and assimilating to their own nature

all other thoughts, and which form new intervals and interstices whose void

forever craves fresh food. ?90 Poetry strengthens the faculty which is the organ

of the moral nature of man in the same manner as exercise strengthens a limb.

?91 A Poet therefore would do ill to embody his own conceptions of right and

wrong which are usually those of his place and time in his poetical {{Sig. 5v}}

creations, which participate in neither. ?92 By this assumption of the inferior

office of interpreting the effect, in which perhaps after all he might acquit

himself but imperfectly, he would resign a glory in a participation in the

cause. ?93 There was little danger that Homer or any of the eternal poets,

should have so far misunderstood themselves as to have abdicated this throne of

their widest dominion. ?94 Those in whom the poetical faculty, though great, is

less intense as Euripedes, Lucan, Tasso, Spencer have frequently affected a

moral aim and the effect of their poetry is diminished in exact proportion to

the degree in which they compel us to advert to this purpose.

14

?95 Homer and the cyclic poets were followed at a certain interval by the

dramatic and lyrical Poets of Athens; who flourished [[contemporaneously]]

contemporaneosly with all that is most perfect in the kindred expressions of the

poetical faculty; architecture, painting, music, the dance, sculpture,

philosophy, and we may add the forms of civil life. ?96 For although the scheme

of Athenian society was deformed by many imperfections which the poetry existing

in Chivalry and Christianity have erased from the habits and institutions of

modern Europe; yet never at any other period has so much energy, beauty and

virtue been developed; never was blind strength and stubborn form so disciplined

and rendered subject to the will of man, or that will less repugnant to the

dictates of the beautiful and the true, as during the century which preceeded

the death of Socrates. ?97 Of no other epoch in the history of our species have

we records and fragments stamped so visibly with the image of the divinity in

man. ?98 But it is Poetry alone, in form, in action or in language which has

rendered this epoch memorable above all others, and the storehouse of examples

to everlasting time. ?99 For written poetry existed at that epoch simultaneously

with the other arts, and it is an idle enquiry to demand which gave and which

received the light, which all as from a common focus have scattered over the

darkest periods of succeeding time. ?100 We know no more of cause and effect

than a constant conjunction of events: Poetry is ever found to coexist with

whatsoever other arts contribute to the happiness and perfection of man. ?101 I

appeal to what has already been established to distinguish between the cause and

the effect.

15

?102 {{Sig. 6r}} It was at the period here adverted to, that the Drama had its

birth; and however a succeeding writer may have equalled or surpassed those few

great specimens of the Athenian drama which have been preserved to us, it is

indisputable that the art itself never was under stood or practised according to

the true philosophy of it, as at Athens. ?103 For the Athenians employed

language, action, music, painting, the dance, and religious institutions, to

produce a common effect in the representation of the highest idealisms of

passion and of power; each division in the art was made perfect in its kind by

artists of the most consummate skill, and was disciplined into a beautiful pro

portion and unity one towards the other. ?104 On the modern stage a few only of

the elements capable of expressing the image of the poets conception are

employed at once. ?105 We have tragedy without music and dancing; and music and

dancing without the highest impersonation of which they are the fit

accompaniment, and both without religion and solemnity. ?106 Religious

institution has indeed been usually banished from the stage. ?107 Our system of

divesting the actor’s face of a mask, on which the many expressions appropriated

to his dramatic character might be moulded into one permanent and unchanging

expression, is favourable only to a partial and inharmonious effect; it is fit

for nothing — but a monologue where all the attention may be directed to some

great master of ideal mimicry. ?108 The modern practise of blending comedy with

tragedy, though liable to great abuse in point of practise, is undoubtedly an

extension of the dramatic circle; but the comedy should be as in King Lear,

universal, ideal and sublime. ?109 It is perhaps the intervention of this

principle which determines the balance in favour of King Lear against the Œdipus

Tyrannus or the Agamemnon, or, if you will, the trilogies with which they are

connected; unless the intense power of the choral poetry, especially that of the

latter, should be considered as restoring the equilibrium. ?110 King Lear, if it

can sustain the comparison, may be judged to be the most perfect specimen of the

dramatic art existing in the world; in spite of the narrow conditions to which

the poet was subjected by the ignorance of the philosophy of the Drama which has

prevailed in Modern Europe. ?111 Calderon in his religious Autos has attempted

to fulfil some of the high conditions of dramatic representation neglected by

Shakespear; such as the establishing a {{Sig. 6v}} relation between the drama

and religion, and the accomodating them to music and dancing, but he omits the

observation of conditions still more important, and more is lost than gained by

a substitution of the rigidly defined and ever repeated idealisms of a distorted

superstition for the living impersonations of the truth of human passion.

16

?112 But we digress. ?113 — The connexion of scenic exhibitions with the

improvement or corruption of the manners of men, has been universally

recognized: in other words the presence or absence of poetry in its most perfect

and universal form has been found to be connected with good and evil in conduct

or habit. ?114 The corruption which has been imputed to the drama as an effect

begins, when the poetry employ in its constitution, ends: I appeal to the

history of manners whether the [[periods]] of the growth of the one and the

decline of the other have not corresponded with an exactness equal to any other

example of moral cause and effect.

17

?115 The drama at Athens or wheresoever else it may have approached to its

perfection, ever co-existed with the moral and intellectual greatness of the

age. ?116 The tragedies of the Athenian poets are as mirrors in which the

spectator beholds himself, under a thin disguise of circumstance, stript of all,

but that ideal perfection and energy which every one feels to be the internal

type of all that he loves, admires and would become. ?117 The imagination is

enlarged by a sympathy with pains and passions so mighty that they distend in

their conception the capacity of that by which they are [[conceived]] concieved;

the good affections are strengthened by pity, indignation, terror and sorrow;

and an exalted calm is prolonged from the satiety of this high exercise of them

into the tumult of familiar life; even crime is disarmed of half its horror and

all its contagion by being represented as the fatal consequence of the

unfathomable agencies of {{Sig. 7r}} nature; error is thus divested of its

wilfulness; men can no longer cherish it as the creation of their choice. ?118

In a drama of the highest order there is little food for censure or hatred: it

teaches rather self knowledge and self-respect. ?119 Neither the eye or the mind

can see itself unless reflected upon that which it resembles. ?120 The drama so

long as it continues to express poetry, is as a prismatic and many sided mirror,

which collects the brightest rays of human nature and divides and reproduces

them from the simplicity of these elementary forms; and touches them with

majesty and beauty, and multiplies all that it reflects, and endows it with the

power of propagating its like wherever it may fall.

18

?121 But in periods of the decay of social life, the drama sympathizes with that

decay. ?122 Tragedy becomes a cold imitation of the form of the great

master-pieces of antiquity, divested of all harmonious accompaniment of the

kindred arts; and often the very form misunderstood: or a weak attempt to teach

certain doctrines, which the writer considers as moral truths; and which are

usually no more than specious flatteries of some gross vice or weakness with

which the author in common with his auditors are infected. ?123 Hence what has

been called the classical and the domestic drama. ?00 Addison’s Cato is a

specimen of the one, and would it were not superfluous to cite examples of the

other! ?124 To such purposes Poetry cannot be made subservient. ?00 Poetry is a

sword of lightning ever unsheathed, which consumes the scabbard that would

contain it. ?125 And thus we observe that all dramatic writings of this nature

are unimaginative in a singular degree; they affect sentiment and passion: which

divested of imagination are other names for caprice and appetite. ?126 The

period in our own history of the greatest degradation of the drama is the reign

of Charles II when all forms in which poetry had been accustomed to be expressed

become hymns to the triumph of kingly power over liberty and virtue. ?127 Milton

stood alone illuminating an age unworthy of him. ?00 At such periods the

calculating principle pervades all the forms of dramatic exhibition, and poetry

ceases to be expressed upon them. ?128 Comedy loses its ideal universality: wit

succeeds to humour; we laugh from self complacency and triumph instead of

pleasure; malignity, sarcasm |&| contempt succeeds to sympathetic merriment; we

hardly laugh, but we smile. ?129 Obscenity, which is ever blasphemy against the

divine beauty in life, becomes, from the very veil which it assumes, more active

if less disgusting: {{Sig. 7v}} it is a monster for which the corruption of

society for ever brings forth new food; which it devours in secret.

19

?130 The Drama being that form under which a greater number of modes of

expression of poetry are susceptible of being combined than any other; the

connexion of beauty and social good, is more observable in the drama than in

what ever other form: and it is indisputable that the highest perfection of

human society has ever corresponded with the highest dramatic excellence: and

that the corruption or the extinction of the drama in a nation where it has once

flourished is a mark of a corruption of manners, and an extinction of the

energies which sustain the soul of social life. ?131 But, as Machiavelli says of

political institutions, that life may be preserved and renewed, if men should

arise capable of bringing back the drama to its principles. ?132 And this is

true with respect to poetry in its most extended sense: all language,

institution and form require not only to be produced but to be sustained: the