14. Brenner R. Agrarian Class Structure and Economic Development in Pre-Industrial Europe. Past & Present, 70, 1976.
15. Canarella G., Tomaske J . A. The Optimal Utilization of Slaves // The J. of Economic History. 1975. Vol. 35, 3. 621–629.
16. Conning J . On ‘The Causes of Slavery or Serfdom and the Roads to Agrarian Capitalism: Domar’s Hypothesis Revisited. URL: http://ideas.repec.org/p/htr/hcecon/401.html, 2004
17. Conrad A., Meyer J . The Economics of Slavery in the Antebellum South // J. of Political Economy. 1958. 66. 95–130.
18. David P., Temin P . Slavery: The Progressive Institution? // J. of Economic History. 1974. Vol. 34, 3. 739–83.
19. David P., Temin P . Explaining the Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South: A Comment // American Economic Rev. 1979. 69. 213–18.
20. Domar E. The causes of slavery or serfdom: a hypothesis // J. of Economic History. 1970. 18–32.
21. Domar E., Machina V. J . On the Profitability of Russian Serfdom // Ibid. 1984. Vol. 44, 4. 919–955.
22. Earle C. V . A Staple Interpretation of Slavery and Free Labor // Geographical Rev. 1978. Vol. 68, 1. 51–65.
23. Engerman S . Slavery at different times and places // American Historic Rev. 2000. 105, 2. 480–484.
24. Engerman S., Sokoloff K . Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of development Among New Word Economies // Working Paper 0259, national Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.
25. Eswaran M., Kotwal A . A theory of two-tier labor markets in agrarian economies // American Economic Rev. 1985. 75. 162–77.
26. Fenoaltea S. Authority, Efficiency, and Agricultural Organization in Medieval England and Beyond: A Hypothesis // J. of Economic History. 1975. 35. 695–96.
27. Fenoaltea S . Slavery and Supervision in Comparative Perspective: A model // The J. of Economic History. 1984. 44, 3.
28. Findlay R. Slavery, Incentives and Manumission: A Theoretical Model // J. of Political Economy. 1975. Vol. 83, 5. 923–33.
29. Fleisig H. Slavery, the Supply of Agricultural Labor, and the Industrialization of the South // J. of Economic History. 1976. Vol. 34, 3. 572–97.
30. Fogel R. W., Engerman S. L. Time on the Cross. Boston, 1974.
31. Fogel R. W., Engerman S. L . Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture in the Antebellum South // American Economic Rev. 1977. 67. 275–96.
32 .Genicot G. Bonded Labor and Serfdom: A Paradox of Voluntary Choice // J. of Development Economics. 2002. Vol. 67, 1. 101–127.
33. Genovese E . The Political Economy of Slavery: Studies in the Economy and Society of the Slave South. N. Y., 1965.
34. Gerschenkron A. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective, Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, 1962.
35. Goldin C. The Economics of Urban Slavery: 1820 to 1860, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago, 1972, subsequently published as Urban Slavery in the American South, 1820–1860: A Quantitative History. Chicago, 1976.
36. Haluk I . Ergin, Serdar Sayan. A Microeconomic Analysis of Slavery in Comparison to Free Labor Economies. July 1997. URL: http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~sayan/DiscussionPapers/DP97-08/slavery.pdf
37. Haskell T. L. Explaining the Relative Efficiency of SlaveAgriculture in the Antebellum South: A Reply to Fogel-Engerman // American Economic Rev. 1979. Vol. 69, 1. 206–7.
38. Hanes C. Turnover cost and the distribution of slave labor in Anglo-America // J. of Economic History. 1996. 56. 307–29.
39. Kahan A . Notes on Serfdom in Western and Eastern Europe // The J. of Economic History. 1973. Vol. 33, 1. 86–99.
40 .Krugman P . Serfs up! URL: http://www.pkarchive.org/theory/SerfsUp.html
41. Lagerlof N.-P . Slavery and Other Property Rights // The Rev. on Economic Studies. 2009. 76. 319–342.
42. Nieboer H. J . Slavery as an Industrial System: Ethnological Researches // The Hague. 1900.
43. North D., Thomas R . The Rise and Fall of the Manorial System: A Theoretical Model // J. of Economic History. 1971. Vol. XXXI. 777–803.
44. North D. Institutions, transaction costs and economic development // Economic Inquiry. 1987. 25(3). 419–428.
45. Olmsted F. L. Journeys and Explorations in the Cotton Kingdom. A Traveller’s Observations, 1861.
46 .Rosa J.-J . Freedom and Serfdom: Domar’s puzzle revisited. URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1428729
47. Schaefer D. F., Schmitz M. D. The Relative Efficiency of Slave Agriculture: A Comment // American Economic Rev. 1979. Vol. 69, 1. 208–12.
48. Stampp K. The Peculiar Institution: Slavery in the Antebellum South. N. Y., 1956.
49. Stanziani A . Serf, slaves, or wage earners? The legal status of labour in Russia from a comparative prespective, from sixteenth to the nineteenth century // J. of Global History. 2008. 3. 183–202.
50. Strickland W . Observations on the Agriculture of the United States of America. N. Y., 1971.
51. Volin L . The Russian Peasant and Serfdom // Agricultural History. 1943. Vol. 17, № 1. 41–61.
52. Wright G . The Efficiency of Slavery: Another Interpretation // American Economic Rev. 1979. Vol. 69, 1. 219–26.
53. Wright G. Slavery and the Cotton Boom // Explorations in Economic History. 1975. 12. 439–52.
54. Zilversmit A. The First Emancipation: The Abolition of Slavery in the North. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1967.