Темы курсовых работ (рефератов) по лингвострановедению и страноведению для студентов 5 курса
1. What is language? Its origins and functions. Language families. Germanic languages.
2. The English language. Main stages of its development. Formation of the national language.
3. The English language. Its past, present and future.
4. The English language and linguistic representation of Reality.
5. Language of Literature, its influence on culture and Ideology, Mentality of a nation.
6. Language of Mass Media. Functions of Mass Media. Publicistic style and its peculiarities.
7. Pragmatics, its essence and relationship with other sciences-grammar, stylistics, lexicography etc.
8. Geographical position, Economy, Natural Resources of the UK/USA.
9. Customs, traditions, national festivals. Way of life of the UK/USA.
10. Political set-up, Constitution, Political Parties. Electoral system of the UK/USA.
11. Population, ethnic groups. Class system, racial and ethnic relation in the UK/USA.
12. Religion. The basic elements of Religion. The functions of Religion, types of religious institutions.
13. Administrative division of the UK. Local self-government bodies.
14. Secondary and higher Education in the UK/USA.
15. The Commonwealth, main stages of its history, its collapse.
16. European Union and NATO. Main stages of their Development.
17. History of Soviet (Russian) - British relations (XVIII-XX centuries).
18. The USA - USSR political and military relations in the WW II period.
19. History of the Second Front in Europe.
20. E.Hemingway. His politics, activities. His place and role in English literature. Women's portraits in his works.
21. G. Orwell. His politics and activities. His works: "1948", "Animal Yard". "Politics and the English language".
22. A.Huxley. His politics and literary activities. His book “Brave New World”
23. English dictionaries and their role in achieving intercultural and communicative competence.
24. Linguistic Representation of reality in synonymic (ideographic) dictionaries of the English and Russian languages.
Вопросы для контроля и самоконтроля
за усвоением материала курса:
1. Предмет, задачи и цели курса «Лингвострановедение и страноведение». Связь дисциплины с другими науками. Роль курса в овладении иностранным языком.
2. Основные этапы истории страны. Языковые реалии, связанные с важнейшими историческими событиями, культурно-историческими и социальными ассоциациями.
3. Государственное устройство и общественно-политический строй, система образования страны изучаемого языка. Особенности национальной культуры и самобытности носителей иностранного языка.
4. Национальный и социальный состав населения страны изучаемого языка. Демографические и социальные проблемы. Административно-территориальное деление страны. Роль местного самоуправления в жизни людей.
5. Английский язык, его место в семье индоевропейских языков. Основные этапы истории английского языка. Становление национального английского языка. Языковые реалии, связанные с важнейшими историческими событиями. Причины языковой экспансии.
6. Британское содружество – его становление, расцвет и распад. Военно-политические и экономические блоки и союзы – НАТО, Евросоюз, ВТО и др. Роль Англии и США в Европе и современном мире.
7. Научно-философское определение понятия «язык». Сущность языка и его основные функции. Язык как средство формирования мысли, общения, передачи культурно-исторического наследия от поколения к поколению и т.д.
8. Английский язык и отображение им картины реального мира в сознании его носителей.
9. Современный английский язык. Проблемы его изучения в современной лингвистике. Вопросы языковой политики в Англии и США. Перспективы развития английского языка.
10. Национальный язык и язык английской художественной литературы; взаимоотношения между ними.
11. Газетно-публицистический жанр, его особенности. Язык СМИ как одно из важнейших средств формирования государственной идеологии.
12. Новые подходы в методике преподавания и изучения иностранного языка. Обучение межкультурной коммуникации. Роль личности преподавателя иностранного языка в учебно-воспитательном процессе в вузе.
13. Англоязычная лексикография. Основные типы словарей: лингвистические, энциклопедические, лингвострановедческие и др. Роль лингвострановедческой и страноведческой компетентности в достижении взаимопонимания между представителями разных культур.
Chapter 1.Language, its essence and its functions
1. What is language?
F.M.Berezin
Interest in language, how it originated, how it works and develops, has existed from time immemorial. For a long time the word "language" was a general notion used to mean the entire communicative means of man. For many, this was the broadest way of regarding language. Whatever earlier approaches to the nature of languages there have been, we realize now that language is a product of human society and can exist only in human society.
There is no language outside society. Language can be understood properly if it is studied in close connection with the history of human society. Language reflects the character, mentality and social activity of the people who use it.
Language is human and only human. The latest research has shown that some species of animals also communicate, but they do not talk in the sense in which we usually use this word. People can also use other means of communication, such as red lights, or flags, but these signs are interpreted into language. Language is the normal form and means of communication and it is determined by the social, economic and cultural history of the people speaking it.
To define language with precision is far less easy than, for example, to define "acid" or other chemical terms. This is because many scientific researchers are interested in language—philosophers, psychologists, logicians, sociologists, as well as linguists. As language is closely connected with thinking and is considered a vehicle of thought it has fallen under the scrutiny of philosophers. Logicians study the laws of thinking and their reflection in language. Language is of social character by its origin and thus draws the attention of sociologists.
Here are some definitions of language that have been given by various scientists from several countries:
Hegel (1770-1831), the prominent German philosopher, said that "language is the art of theoretical intelligence in its true sense, for it is its outward expression."
F. de Saussure (1857-1913), the famous French linguist, defined language as a system of signs expressing ideas.
E. Sapir,(1884-1939), an outstanding American linguist, considered language to be a purely human and non-instinctive-method of communicating ideas, emotions and desires by means of a system of voluntarily produced symbols.
The American linguist L. Bloomfield (1887-1949) stated that language enabled one person to express a reaction to another's stimulus. He considered language in terms of behavioral patterns like walking, eating, etc. According to this approach, this set of patterns can remain unused for a long period of time and then be called into operation by an appropriate stimulus.
Many definitions of language have been put forward, but those given above are enough to show that none of them are exclusive. They bring out different aspects of language and supplement on« another, but they do not give a comprehensive definition.
A correct understanding of the essence of language depends upon one's approach to the great fundamental questions of philosophy as a whole. The basis of all schools of philosophy is connected with the relation between thought and existence, spirit and nature.
Dividing the philosophers of all time into "two great camps",—idealist and materialist,- F. Engels showed that allegiance to one of these camps depends upon a correct solution of the question: "...in what relation do our thoughts about the world surrounding us stand to this world itself? Is our thinking capable of the cognition of the real world? Are we able in our ideas and notions of the real world to produce a correct reflection of reality?"
In Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy, Engels declares the two main philosophic schools to be materialism and idealism. Materialism regards nature as primary and spirit as secondary; being is first, and thinking, second.
Philosophical materialism asserts that thinking, consciousness, being secondary in their character, nevertheless exist in reality in the same way, as different forms of movable matter. At the same time it indicates that just as one form of matter known as cerebrum stipulates the functioning of thought so this thought is accomplished in certain material form.
So, from the point of view of dialectical materialism secondariness of spirit, thinking, consciousness and primariness of matter is manifested in the fact that thinking, being closely connected with material physiological processes, can occur and occurs only by and with the help of language.
Alongside with the philosophical problem of the interrelation between thinking and language philosophical materialism; emphasizes the function of language as a kind of man's cognitive activity, as a means of transfer of experience, gained in the past, to the future generations.
Now the question arises why language is the most important means of human communication. The answer will become clear if we analyse non-linguistic means of communication.
The transmission of meaning, the conveyance of significant concepts, may be realized not only by language, but also with sign-posts, the Morse code, gesture language and signal fires, and so on, i.e., by devices that have nothing to do either with spoken language or with its written counterpart. African natives, for example, use drums as a long-distance telephone. The same goes for the smoke signals of the American Indians.
Some non-linguistic forms of communication come close to spoken language. The whistling language used by the natives of Gomera, in the Canary Islands, who can communicate in it over very long distances (about six miles), is one of these.
Gesticulation as an aid to spoken language is universally used by all human communities on Earth, but to different degrees and with different symbolic meanings-' Differences in the meanings of gestures are often striking, and are governed by social convention. To the Russians, for instance, a downward nod of the head means "yes", and a shaking of the head from side to side, "no". On the other hand, the modern Czechs express "no" by a downward jerk of the head. The question why the language of gestures did not become universal instead of spoken language may be explained by the fact that it occupies the hands, while spoken language leaves the hands free for other tasks; it also requires light and a clear view, while spoken language can be used in the dark and through obstacles. Some Soviet linguists admit that there are common features between language and other sign-systems. These common features are the following:
(a) they serve as a means of expression, conveying ideas or feelings;
(b) they are of a social character, as they are created by society with a view to serving it;
(c) they are material in essence though their material form is different (sound-waves, graphic schemes, the Morse code, and so on);
(d) they all reflect objective reality.
But the differences between language and these sign-systems are more essential. They are as follows:
(1) Language is the total means of expressing ideas and feelings and communicating messages from one individual to others, used by all people in all their spheres of activity. All other sign-systems are restricted in their usage and limited in their expressive capacity. For instance, music conveys emotions, but it does not name them; it cannot express concepts and judgments, or transmit ideas. It embraces only those people who understand it and is limited to those musical works which have actually been created by composers. Other people can perceive this "sound system", but they cannot use it actively.
(2) Language conveys not only the essence of the facts, but the speaker's attitude towards them, his estimation of reality and his will. Language is connected not only with logical thinking, but with psychology of people too.
(3) All sign-systems apart from language are artificial, and they are created and changed by convention. They are made not by the people as a whole, but by a relatively small group of representatives of the given speciality.
The development of language does not depend upon the will of the members of society. Each generation adopts the language it is given historically, and the development of language may be characterized as a historical process with its own objective laws.
To sum up. All sign-systems are subsidiary to language. Each of them has its own advantages over language, such as precision, brevity, abstraction, clarity and so on. But none of them can replace language as the universal means of communication of people in all fields of activity, conveying ideas, thoughts, and emotions, and they cannot be called important for those reasons.
A great contribution towards solving this problem was made by I. P. Pavlov, the distinguished Soviet physiologist and psychologist. His discovery of conditioned reflexes and his description of the animal's new nervous connections with its conditions of life represent a great step forward in the development of the theory of reflexes. Pavlov regarded conditioned or temporarily acquired reflexes as a function of the animal organism specially adapted to achieve a more and more perfect equilibrium between the organism and its environment. Pavlov said: "When developing animal world reached the stage of man, an extremely important addition was made to the mechanism of nervous activity. In the animal, reality is signalized almost exclusively by stimulations and by the traces they leave in the cerebral hemispheres, which come directly to the special cells of the visual auditory or other receptors of the organism. This is the first system of signals common to man and animals. But speech constitutes a second signaling system of reality which is peculiarly ours, being the signal of the first signals. On the one hand numerous speech stimulations have removed us from reality, and we must always remember this in order not to distort our attitude to reality. On the other hand, it is precisely speech which has made us human... However it cannot be doubted that the fundamental laws governing the activity of the first signaling system must also govern that of the second because it, too, is activity of the same nervous tissue."
These theoretical generalizations of Pavlov's revealed the nature of higher nervous activity and led him to the concept of the first and second signaling systems, of which he regarded the latter as peculiar to the human brain.