F. Implementation of decision II/12
13. Based on the information provided by Parties pursuant to article 13 of the Convention for the years 2004 and 2005, the Secretariat has prepared consolidated reports on Parties’ restrictions on the transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and other wastes. These reports are available on the Basel Convention website http://www.basel.int/natreporting/2004/compI/q3.pdf and http://www.basel.int/natreporting/2005/compI/q3.pdf, respectively.
_______________
[1] По соображениям экономии приложение представляется только на английском языке и официально не редактировалось.
[2] Document UNEP/CHW.8/INF/13 contains the list of ninety‑nine parties which reported for the year as at 29 September 2006. In addition, New Zealand and Norway transmitted their updated/completed 2004 questionnaire to the Secretariat in February 2007 and March 2007 respectively.
[3] Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Djibouti, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Finland, France, Gambia, Germany, Greece, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Latvia, Lesotho, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Poland, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Rwanda, Samoa, Senegal, Serbia and Montenegro, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Thailand, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Venezuela, Viet Nam and Zambia.
[4] Antigua and Barbuda, Armenia, Bahamas, Bangladesh, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Comoros, Cook Island, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Denmark, Dominica, Egypt, El Salvador, Georgia, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Iceland, India, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kiribati, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Malawi, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Micronesia (Federated States of) Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Portugal, Russian Federation, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Seychelles, South Africa, Syrian Arab Republic, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Togo, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan and Yemen.
[5] Algeria, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Barbados, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, El Salvador, Estonia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Mexico, Monaco, Montenegro, Mozambique, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Paraguay, Poland, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Rwanda, Serbia, Seychelles, Singapore, Slovakia, Sri Lanka, Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Venezuela and Viet Nam.
[6] Mainly the following clarifications were sought:
Data on Generation of hazardous wastes and other wastes: Is there a significant increase/decrease in the reported generation amount compared to the data reported for the previous year(s)? If yes, whether it would be possible to provide suitable explanatory note? Are these amounts estimated amounts? Whether the generations amounts provided in Tables 8A and 8B are compatible?
Data on transboundary movements of hazardous wastes and other wastes: Whether the ‘unspecified’ wastes reported fall under the scope of article 1(1)a or article 1(1)b of the Basel Convention? Whether reported data includes ‘non‑hazardous’ wastes? Is there a significant increase/decrease in the reported export/import amount compared to the data reported for the previous year(s)? If yes, whether it would be possible to provide suitable explanatory note? Whether the data reported refers to the actual transboundary movement that took place in the given year or it refers to the permits issued in the given year?