[94] Самые яркие примеры таких работ, в которых капиталистическая демократия увязана с гегемонией США: Friedman T. The Lexus and the Olive Free. – New York: Anchor Books, 2000; Фукуяма Ф. Конец истории и последний человек. – М.: ООО «Издательство АСТ», 2004.
[95] См.: Woods N. Good Governance in International Organization // Global Governance. – 1999. – № 5. – P. 39–61.
[96] См.: Кейган Р. О рае и власти: Америка и Европа в новом мировом порядке. – М.: РОССПЭН, 2004.
[97] См., например: Kaldor M. Global Civil Society: An Answer to War. – Cambridge: Polity, 2003; Ney J. The Paradox of America Power: Why the Worlds Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone. – Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2002.
[98] Цит. по: Hirsh M. At War with Ourselves: Why America Is Squandering Its Chance to Build a Better World. – Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003. – P. 254.
[99] Последовательную критику глобального доминирования США с точки зрения европейского консерватизма можно обнаружить в работах: Gray J. False Dawn. – New York: The New Press, 1999; Тодд Э. После империи. Pax Americana – начало конца. – М.: Международные отношения, 2004.
[100] См.: Супян В.Б. Глобализация американской экономики и ее последствия // США и Канада: экономика, политика, культура. – 2001. – № 5(377). – С. 16–28; Он же. Глобализация экономики: последствия для США // Бизнес Академия. – 2002. – № 4(14). – С. 45–49.
[101] См.: Закария Ф. Будущее свободы: нелиберальная демократия в США и за их пределами. – М.: Ладомир, 2004.
[102] См.: Кагарлицкий Б.Ю. Глобализация и новые социальные движения // Дилеммы глобализации. Социумы и цивилизации: иллюзии и риски. – М.: ИСП РАН, 2002.
[103] См.: Sandel M. Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of A Public Philosophy. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
[104] См.: Лукащук И.И. Глобализация, государство, право, XXI век. – М., 2000; Clark I. Globalization and International Relations Theory. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999; Connolly W.E. Democracy and Territoriality // Millenium. – Vol. 20, № 3. – P. 463–484; Potter D. Democratization. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.
[105] См.: Commission on Global Governance «Our Global Neighbourhood: The Report of the Commission on Global Governance». – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
[106] См.: Keohane R. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? // Foreign Policy. – 1998. – № 110. – P. 82–96; Idem. Power and Interdependence in a Partially Globalized World. – New York: Routledge, 2002.
[107] Идея глобального или транснационального гражданского общества остается весьма спорной: исключение любой сферы экономических отношений из концепции гражданского общества является основным пунктом разногласий между марксистскими и либеральными концепциями.
[108] См.: Boli J., Loya T. National Participation in World-Polity Organization. Constructing World Cultures. – Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1999.
[109] См., например: Woods N. Good governance in International Organization // Global Governance. – 1999. – № 5. – P. 39–61.
[110] См.: McGrew A. The Transformation of Democracy? Globalization and Territorial Democracy. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997.
[111] Цит. по: Commission on Global Governance. Our Global Neighborhood, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995. P. 2–5.
[112] См.: Falk R. Liberalism at the Global Level: The Last of the Independent Commissions? // Millenium. – 1995. – № 24(3). – p. 563-578.
[113] McGrew A. The Transformation of Democracy? Globalization and Territorial Democracy. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997. – P. 254.
[114] Цит. по: Keohane R. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? // Foreign Policy. – 1998. – P. 82.
[115] Цит. по: Keohane R. International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work? // Foreign Policy. – 1998. – P. 98.
[116] См.: Commission on Global Governance. Our Global Neighborhood. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1995.
[117] См.: Falk R. Reframing the International: Law, Culture, Politics. – New York: Routledge, 2002. – P. 34–41.
[118] См.: McLennan G. Marxism, Pluralism and Beyond. – Cambridge, Polity Press, 1989.
[119] См.: Hutchings K. International Political Theory: Re-thinking Ethics in a Global Era. – London: Sage Publications, 1999; Idem. Global Civil Society: Thinking Politics and Progress // Global Civil Society: Contested Futures. – 2005. – P. 130–148.
[120] Held D. The Changing Contours of Political Community: Rethinking Democracy in the Context of Globalization, in Holden, B. (eds), Global Democracy: Key Debates. – New York: Routledge, 2000. – P. 17–31.
[121] См.: McGrew A. The Transformation of Democracy? Globalization and Territorial Democracy. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1997. – P. 326.
[122] См.: Деррида Ж. Глобализация, мир и космополитизм // Космополис. – 2004. – № 2 (8). – С. 125–140; Archibugi D. The Global Commonwealth of Citizens. Toward Cosmopolitan Democracy. – Princeton University Press, 2008; Scheuerman W. Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Rule of Law // Ratio Juris. – 2002. – Vol. 15. – P. 439–457.
[123] См.: Held D. Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. – Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995. – P. 234.
[124] См.: Мартин Г.П., Шуман Х. Западня глобализации. Атака на процветание и демократию. – М.: Альпина, 2001.
[125] См.: McGrew A. Transnational Democracy: Theories and Prospects // Discussion Paper Series. – 2004. – № 1.
[126] См.: Dryzek J. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; Deudney D. Global Village Sovereignty. The Greening of Sovereignty. – Boston: MIT Press, 1998. – P. 299–325; Thompson D. Democratic Theory and Global Society // The Journal of Political Philosophy. – 1999. – № 7(2). – P. 111–125.
[127] Цит. по: Dryzek J. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – P. 120.
[128] Цит. по: Dryzek J. Transnational Democracy // The Journal of Political Philosophy. – 1999. – № 7(1). – P. 37.
[129] Цит. по: Saward M. The Terms of Democracy. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998. – P. 64.
[130] Цит. по: Petit P. Republicanism – A Theory of Freedom and Government. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. – P. 185.
[131] См.: Eckersley R. Deliberative Democracy, Ecological Representation and Risk: Towards a Democracy of the Affected. – Mimeo, 2000.
[132] См.: Kymlicka W. Citizenship in an Era of Globalization. Democracy’s Edges. I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[133] См.: Kymlicka W. Liberalism, Community, and Culture. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991; Idem. Politics in the Vernacular: Nationalism, Multiculturalism, Citizenship. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001; Idem. Immigration, Multiculturalism, and the Welfare State // Ethics and International Affairs. – 2006. – Vol. 20.3.
[134] См., например: Gorg C., Hirsch J. Is International Democracy Possible? // Review of International Political Economy. – 1998. – Vol. 5, № 4. – P. 585–615; Dahl R. Can International Organizations be Democratic? Democracy’s Edges. I. Shapiro and C. Hacker-Cordon. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. – P. 19–36.
[135] См.: Wolf K. The New Raison d’Etat as a Problem for Democracy in World Society // European Journal of International Relations. – 1999. – Vol. 5, № 3. – P. 333-363.
[136] См., например: Hirst P. Between the Local and the Global: Democracy in the Twenty First Century. Balancing Democracy. – London: Routledge, 2000; Mayall J. Democracy and International Society // International Affairs. – 2000. – Vol. 76, № 1. – P. 61–75.
[137] Цит. по: Hutchings K. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Sage Publications – London, 1999. – P. 166.
[138] См., например: Burbach R., Nunez O. Globalization and its Discontents. – London: Pluto Press, 1997; Jones R. The World Turned Upside Down? – Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
[139] См.: Давыдов В.М., Бобровников А.В., Теперман А.В. Феномен финансовой глобализации. Универсальные процессы и реакции латиноамериканских стран. – М.: Ин-т Латин. Америки, 2000; Рунов Б.Б. Интеграция Африки в глобальную экономику (тенденции, проблемы, перспективы). – М.: Изд. Дом XXI век. Согласие, 1999.
[140] См.: Cox R. Globalization, Multilateralism and Democracy. Approaches to World Order. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 1997. – P. 524–537.
[141] См.: Бузгалин А.В., Колганов А.И. Глобальный капитал. – М.: Едиториал УРСС, 2004; Miliband R. The State in Capitalist Society. – London: Routledge, 1973.
[142] См.: Hirst P. Between the Local and the Global: Democracy in the Twenty First Century. Balancing Democracy. – London: Routledge, 2000.
[143] См.: Mittleman J. The Globalization Syndrome. – Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
[144] См.: Мальковская И.А. Глобализация как социальная трансформация. – М.: РУДН, 2002; Linklater A. The Transformation of Political Community. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
[145] См.: Linklater A. Critical Theory and World Politics: Citizenship, Sovereignty and Humanity. – New York: Routledge, 2007.
[146] См.: Saward M. The Terms of Democracy. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1998.
[147] См.: Elazar D. Constitutionalizing Globalization. – Boston: Rowman and Littlefield, 1998; Gill S. Globalization, Market Civilization, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism // Millenium. – 1995. – Vol. 24, № 3. – P. 399–424.
[148] См.: Shell G. Trade Legalism and International Relations Theory: An Analysis of the WTO // Duke Law Journal. – 1995. – Vol. 44, № 5. – P. 829–927; Михайлова В.А., Кушлин В.И. Глобализация и ВТО. – М.: РАГС, 2005.
[149] См.: Crawford J. Democracy in International Law. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[150] Цит. по: Mayall J. World Politics: Progress and its Limits. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000. – P. 45.
[151] См., например: O’Brien R. Contesting Global Governance: Multilateral Economic Institutions and Global Social Movements. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[152] См.: Woods N. Good Governance in International Organization // Global Governance. – 1999. – Vol. 5. – P. 39–61.
[153] См.: McGrew A. The WTO :Technocracy or Banana Republic? Global Trade and Global Social Issues. – London: Routledge, 1999.
[154] См.: Weiss T., Gordenker L. NGO’s, The UN, and Global Governance. – London: Lynne Reiner, 1996.
[155] См.: Held D. Democracy and Global Order. – Cambridge: Polity Press, 1995.
[156] См.: Gill S. Economic Globalization and the Internationalization of Authority: Limits and Contradictions // GeoForum. – 1995. – Vol. 23, № 3. – P. 269–283.
[157] См.: Назарчук А.В. Этика глобализирующегося общества. – М.: Директмедиа Паблишинг, 2002.
[158] См., например: Митрофанова Н.В. Глобальная альтернатива? Поиски новых форм демократии для Запада и России. – М., 2000; Greven M. Can the European Union Finally Become a Democracy? Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order. – Boston: Rowman and Littlefield, 2000.
[159] Цит. по: McGrew A. Sustainable globalization? Poverty and Development in the New Century. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – P. 27.
[160] Цит. по: Dryzek J. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – P. 139.
[161] Цит. по: Clark I. Globalization and International Relations Theory. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. – P. 155.
[162] Цит. по: Carr E. The Twenty Years Crisis 1919–1939. – London: Papermac, 1981. – P. 10.