221. Панфілова Т. Потенційно загрозливі фактори набуття Україною членства у Світовій організації торгівлі // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 177-180.
222. Пахомов Ю. Вступление Украины в ВТО как предпосылка и фактор устойчивого экономического роста // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 37-46.
223. Приказчиков А. Механизм разрешения споров во Всемирной торговой организации // Право и политика. Международный научный журнал. – 2000. – №6. – http://www.law-and-politics.com/paper.shtml?a=6_2000&o=241317
224. Пушмин Э.А. Посредничество в международном праве. – М.: Международные отношения, 1970. – 167 с.
225. Пятницький В. Деякі аспекти формування стратегії вступу України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 165-170.
226. Роговий В. Стратегія і тактика приєднання України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 9-15.
227. Рубинштейн Т.Б. ВТО: практический аспект. – М.: Гелиос АРВ, 2004. – 528 с.
228. Сиденко В., Барановский А. Украина и Всемирная торговая организация: как увеличить плюсы и уменьшить минусы? // Зеркало недели. – 2002. –№26(410).
229. Сухоруков А. Забезпечення економічної безпеки України в процесі приєднання до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 153-159.
230. Тимченко Л.Д. Международное право: Учебник. – Х.: «Консум», 1999. – 528 с.
231. Тихонов А. ВТОрая ООН // Финансовые известия. –2003. – 5 авг. – http://www.finiz.ru/cfin/tmpl-art/id_art-611678/
232. Трунк-Федорова М.П. Разрешение споров в рамках Всемирной торговой организации. – СПб.: Издательство юридического факультета С-Петерб. гос. ун-та, 1995. – 312 с.
233. Тускоз Ж. Міжнародне право: Підручник: Пер. з франц. Л. Бадешко. – К.: АртЕк, 1998. – 416 с.
234. Хадсон М. О. Международные суды в прошлом и будущем: Пер. с англ. – М.: Госиностраниздат, 1947. – 391 с.
235. Циганкова Т. Багатоаспектність наслідків приєднання України до СОТ // Зовнішня торгівля: право та економіка. – 2002. – №2(6). – С. 161-164.
236. Шепенко Р.А. Третейские группы ВТО // Мировая экономика и международные отношения. – 2002. – №1. – С. 34-39.
237. Шибаева Е.А. Правовой статус межправительственных организаций. – М.: Юридическая лит-ра, 1972. – 192 с.
238. Энтин М.Л. Международные судебные учреждения. Роль международных арбитражных и судебных органов в разрешении межгосударственных споров. – М.: Международные отношения, 1984. – 174 с.
***
239. Anderson K. Peculiarities of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement // Discussion Paper № 0207. – Adelaide University: Centre for International Economic Studies, March 2002. – http://www.adelaide.edu.au/cies/
240. Aslan Ahmad I. Developing Countries and the WTO Dispute Settlement System. – Switzerland, Bern: World Trade Institute, 2001.
241. Bacchus J. Groping Toward Grotius: The WTO and the International Rule of Law // Harvard International Law Journal. – 2003. – Vol. 44(2). – P. 533-550.
242. Bacchus J. Open Doors for Open Trade: Shining Light on WTO Dispute Settlement // Remarks to the National Foreign Trade Council. – Washington DC, 2004.
243. Bacchus J. Table Talk: Around the Table of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organisation // Vanderbilt Journal of Transitional Law. – 2002. – Vol. 35, № 4. – P. 1021-1039.
244. Bacchus J. The Appeals of Trade: the Making of an Old GATT Hand // Address to the International Law Conference of the American BAR Association. – Washington DC: Georgetown Law School, 2003.
245. Bacchus J. The Strange Death of Sir Francis Bacon: The Dos and Don’ts of Appellate Advocacy in the WTO // Address at the Barber-Surgeons Hall. – London, 2003.
246. Bacchus J. “Woulda, Coulda Shoulda”: The Consolations of WTO Dispute Settlement // Address to the International BAR Association. – Geneva, 2003.
247. Bagwell K., Mavroidis P., Staiger R. The Case for Tradable Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement // WB Policy Research Working Paper № 3314. – World Bank, May 2004.
248. Bagwell K., Staiger R. GATT – Think // NBER Working Paper Series. – Working Paper № 8005. – MA. Cambridge, 2000.
249. Barfield C. Free Trade, Sovereignty and Democracy. Proposals for Reform and Reasons for Retaining the Status Quo. – Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute Press, 2001.
250. Bello J.H. The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Less is More //American Journal of International Law. – 1996. –Vol. 90. – P. 416-418.
251. Bhagwati J. The World Trading System at Risk. – Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1991.
252. Bhala R. The Myth About Stare Decisis and International Trade Law // American University International Law Review. – 1999. –Vol. 14. – P. 845-956.
253. Black’s Law Dictionary: 6th-ed. – St.Paul, 1990.
254. Black’s Law Dictionary: 7th-ed. – St.Paul, 1999.
255. Bown C.P. On the Economic Success of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement // The Review of Economics and Statistics – 2003. – Vol.86 (3). – P. 811-823.
256. Bown C.P. The Economics of Trade Disputes, the GATT’s Article XXIII and the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding. – Waltham: Brandeis University, 2001.
257. Bown C.P. Trade Disputes and the Implementation of Protection under GATT: An Empirical Assessment. –Waltham: Brandeis University, 2001.
258. Bown C.P. Trade Remedies and WTO Disputes Settlement: Why Are So Few Challenged? – Waltham: The Brookings Institution & Brandeis University, 2004.
259. Brandsteller P. The Participation of NGO’s in the WTO Dispute Settlement System. – NY: New York University, 2003.
260. Breuss F. WTO Dispute Settlement from an Economic Perspective. More Failure than Success //Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration: Research Institute for European Affairs. – Working Paper № 39. – Vienna, 2001.
261. Brimeyer B.L. Bananas, Beef and Compliance in the World Trade Organisation: the Inability of the WTO Dispute Settlement Process to Achieve Compliance From Superpower Nations // Minnesota Journal of Global Trade. – 2001. – Winter. – P.133-168.
262. Bronckers M., Van den Broek N. Financial Compensation in the WTO: Improving the Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2005. – Vol. 8(1). – P. 101-126.
263. Bronckers M., Jackson J. Editorial Comment: Outside Counsel in WTO Dispute Process // Journal of International Economic Law. – 1999. – Vol. 2(1). – 155-158.
264. Bronckers M. More Power to the WTO? // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 41-65.
265. Brosch K. Improvements in WTO Dispute Settlement // Agriculture in the WTO: Economic Research Service / USDA. – 1998. – WRS-98-4. – P. 36-40.
266. Buergenthal T., Maier H. Public International Law in Nutshell: 2nd ed. – St. Paul, Minn.: West Publishing Co, 1990.
267. Busch M.L. Democracy, Consultation, and the Panelling of Disputes under GATT. – Cambridge: Harvard University, 1999.
268. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Developing Countries and General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade / World Trade Organisation Dispute Settlement // Journal of World Trade. – 2003. – Vol. 37(4). – P. 719-735.
269. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. The Evolution of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement // Trade Policy Review. – 2003. – P. 143-183.
270. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Testing International Trade Law: Empirical Studies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement. – Atlanta: Emory University, 2000.
271. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Three’s a Crowd: Third Parties and WTO Dispute Settlement. – Atlanta: Emory University, 2000.
272. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Trade Brief on the WTO Dispute Settlement. – Stockholm: SIDA, 2004.
273. Busch M.L., Reinhardt E. Transatlantic Trade Conflicts and GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement // Transatlantic Ecomonic Disputes: the EU, the US and the WTO by Petersmann E.U. and Pollack M.A. (eds.) – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. – P. 465- 485.
274. Bütler M., Hauser H. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: a First Assessment from an Economic Perspective // Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. – 2000. – Vol.16, № 2. – P. 792-821.
275. Cameron J., Gray K.R. Principles of International Law in the WTO Dispute Settlement Body // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. – 2001. –Vol. 50(2). – P. 248-298.
276. Canal-Forges E. Le Système de Réglement des Diférénds le l’OMC // Revue Générale de Droit International Public. – 1994. – P. 689-718.
277. Chakravarthi R. The World Trade Organisation and its Dispute Settlement System: Titling the Balance against the South // Trade and Development Series. – 2000. – №9. – P. 1-48.
278. Chang Pao-Li. The Evolution and Utilisation of the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism // Materials of Research Seminar in International Economics. – Discussion Paper № 475. – Michigan University, April 2002.
279. Charnovitz S. Judicial Independence in the World Trade Organisation // International Organisations and International Dispute Settlement: Trends and Prospects by de Chazournes L.B., Romano C. and MacKenzie R. (eds.) – P. 219-240.
280. Charnovitz S. Rethinking WTO Trade Sanctions //American Journal of International Law. – 2002. –Vol. 95. – P. 792-832.
281. Charnovitz S. The WTO’s Problematic “Last Resort” Against Non-compliance // Aussenwirtschaft. – 2002. – № 57(4) – P. 409-439.
282. Chaytor B. Reforming Dispute Settlement for Sustainable Development // Materials of the Workshop Organised by Institute for International and European Environmental Policy. – Berlin. – 2002.
283. Clarkson S. Locked In? Canada’s External Constitution under global Trade Governance // preprint for American Review of Canadian Studies. – 2002. – Nov. – http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-3387324/Locked-in-Canada-s-external.html
284. Cottier T., Satoko T. The Balance of Power in WTO Decision-Making – Towards Weighted Voting in Legislative Response // Aussenwirtschaft. –2003. – Vol.59(2). – P. 171-214.
285. Croley S.P., Jackson J.H. WTO Dispute Procedures, Standard of Review, and Deference to National Governments // American Journal of International Law. – 1996. – Vol. 90, Issue 2., Apr. – P. 193-213.
286. Dam K. The GATT: Law and International Economic Organisation. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
287. Davey W.J., Adams E. M. Japan, WTO Dispute Settlement and the Millennium Round. – Illinois: University of Illinois, 2000.
288. Davey W.J. Implementation in the WTO Dispute Settlemen: An Introduction to the Problems and Possible Solutions // Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series. – Research Paper №05-16. – Illinois: November, 2005.
289. Davey W.J. Reforming the WTO Dispute Settlement // Illinois Public Law and Legal Theory Research Papers Series. – Research Paper № 04-01 – Illinois: 2000.
290. Davey W.J. Resolving US-European Trade Disputes Through Law: Is the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism Effective? – Illinois: University of Illinois, 2003.
291. Davey W.J. The WTO/GATT World Trading System: An Overview // Handbook of WTO/GATT Dispute Settlement by Pescatore P. et al. (eds.). – Irvington on Hudson, N.Y.: Transnational Juris Publications; The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1991.
292. De Bievre D. Judicialisation and Positive Integration in the WTO // Materials of the 5th Pan-European International Relations Conference. – Standing Group on International Relations (SGIR) of the European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR). – Netherlands, Den Haag. – September 2004.
293. Dempsey K.M. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: A Practising Lawyer’s Perspective // Remarks before Symposium on Legal Issues in the Doha Agenda. – China, Shanghai, 2003.
294. Diego-Fernandez M., Herran R. The Reform of the WTO Dispute Understanding: A Closer Look at the Mexican Proposal // Manchester Journal of International Economic Law. – 2004. – Vol. 1(1). – P. 4-23.
295. Ehlermann C.-D. Tension Between the Dispute Settlement Process and the Diplomatic and Treaty-Making Activities of the WTO // World Trade Review. – 2002. – № 1(3). –P. 301-308.
296. Ehlermann C.-D. Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court” – Some Personal Experience as Member of the Appellate Body of the WTO// Journal of the World Trade. –2002. –36(4). – P. 605-639.
297. Enhancing the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Understanding: A Working Group Report. – London: The Federal Trust for Education and Research, December 2002.
298. Feliciano F.P., Van den Bossche P. The Dispute Settlement Process of the World Trade Organisation – Institutions, Process and Practice // Proliferation of International Organisations – Legal Issues by Blokker N. and Schermers, H. (eds.) – The Hague: Kluwer. – P. 297-350.
299. Freneau A. WTO Dispute Settlement System and Implementation of Decisions: a Developing Country Perspective. – Manchester: University of Manchester, 2000.
300. Garrett G., McCallSmith J. The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement // Materials of the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. – Atlanta: Yale University, 1999.
301. Gascoine D. WTO Dispute Settlement: Lessons Learned from Salmon Case // Materials of the 5th Annual Conference on International Trade Education and Research of the Australia. – Melbourne: APEC Study Centre, 2000.
302. GATS – Fact and Fiction. – Geneva: WTO, 2001.
303. Gleason C., Walther P. The WTO Dispute Settlement Implementation Procedures: A System on Need of Reform // Law and Policy in International Business. – 2000. – Spring. – P. 709-736.
304. Goh G., Witbreuk T. An Introduction to the WTO Dispute Settlement System // University of Western Australia Law Review. – 2001. – Vol. 30(1). – P. 51-74.
305. Grane P. Remedies under WTO Law // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4. – P. 755-772.
306. Gray Ch. Types of Remedies in ICJ Cases: Lessons for the WTO? // Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures by Weiss, F. (ed.) – London: Cameron May, 2000. – P. 401-415.
307. Griller S. Judicial Enforceability of the WTO Law in the European Union. Annotation to case C-149/96 Portugal vs. Council // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2000. – Vol. 3. – P. 441-472.
308. Guzman A. The Political Economy of Litigation and Settlement at the WTO. – Berkeley: UC Berkeley, 2003.
309. Hecht J. C. Operation of WTO Settlement Panels: Assessing Proposals for Reform // Materials of the American BAR Association Conference “The First Five Years of the WTO” at the Georgetown University Law Center. – January 2000.
310. Helmedach Ahim, Zangl B. Dispute Settlement under GATT and WTO: An Empirical Enquiry into a Regime Change // Materials of the Pan-European International Relations Conference “Constructing World Orders”. – Hague. – September 2004.