311. Hird J. WTO Dispute Settlement Managing the Agenda after Seattle // Materials of the 5th Annual Conference on International Trade Education and Research of the Australia. – Melbourne: APEC Study Centre, 2000.
312. Hoekman B.M., Mavroidis P.C. Competition, Competition Policy and the GATT // World Economy. – 1994. – Vol. 17. – P.121-150.
313. Hoekman B.M., Mavroidis P.C. Enforcing Multilateral Commitments: Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries //Materials of the WTO - World Bank Conference on Developing Countries in a Millennium Round. – Geneva: WTO Secretariat, 1999.
314. Hoekman B.M. and Mavroidis P.C. WTO Dispute Settlement, Transparency and Surveillance. – Washington DC: World Bank, Nov. 1999.
315. Holmes P., Rollo J., Young A. Emerging Trends in WTO Dispute Settlement. Back to the GATT? // World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series. – Working Paper № 3133. – 2003.
316. Horlick G. Problems with the Compliance Structure of the WTO Dispute Resolution Process // The Political Economy of International Trade Law by Kennedy D. and Southwick J. (eds.). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. – P. 636–645.
317. Horn H., Mavroidis P., Nordstrom H. Is the Use of the WTO Dispute Settlement System Biased?// Discussion Paper № 2340. – London: Centre for Economic Policy Research, 1999.
318. Horn H., Mavroidis P.C. Remedies in the WTO Dispute Settlement System and Developing Country Interest. – Washington DC: World Bank, 1999.
319. Hudec R.E. Enforcing International Trade Law: The Evolution of the Modern GATT Legal System. – Salem NH: Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1993.
320. Hudec R.E. Broadening the Scope of Remedies in WTO Dispute Settlement // preprint for Improving WTO Dispute Settlement Process by Weiss F. and Wiers J. (eds.) – London: Cameron May Publishers, 2000.
321. Hudec R.E. Does Agreement on Agriculture Work? Agricultural Disputes after the Uruguay Round // IATRC Working Paper № 98-2. – International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium, University of Minnesota, 1998.
322. Hudec R.E. GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an “Aim and Effect” Test. – Minn.: University of Minnesota, 1998.
323. Hudec R.E. Retaliation against Unreasonable Foreign Trade Practices: The New Section 301 and GATT Nullification and Impairment // Minnesota Law Review. – 1975. – Vol. 59. – P. 461-513.
324. ICC: Proposals for Improvements to the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Paris: ICC, March 2003, Doc. 103/235.
325. Institutional Reform of the WTO // Oxfam GB Discussion Paper. – London: Oxfam, 2000.
326. International Law Association: International Trade Law Committee. – 6th Report // Materials of Berlin ILA Conference. – Berlin. – 2004.
327. Irwin D.A. The GATT’s Contribution to Economic Recovery in Post-War Western Europe // NBER Working Paper Series. – Working Paper №4944. – MA. Cambridge, 1994.
328. Issues Regarding the Review of the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism // Trade-Related Agenda, Development and Equity (T.R.A.D.E.). Working Papers’ Series. – №1. – South Centre, 1999.
329. Jackson J.H. The Legal Meaning of the GATT Dispute Settlement Report // The Jurisprudence of GATT and the WTO: Insights on treaty law and economic relations. – Cambridge, 2000. – P. 162-167.
330. Jackson J.H. Dispute Settlement in the WTO: Policy and Jurisprudential Considerations. – Michigan: The University of Michigan, 1998.
331. Jackson J.H. The World Trading System – 2nd ed. – Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1997.
332. Jackson J.H. The WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding – Misunderstanding on the Nature of Legal Obligation // American Journal of International Law. – 1997. –Vol. 91, Issue 1. – P. 60-64.
333. Janov M.E. The Role of the Secretariat in Dispute Settlement // preprint for the World Trade Forum. – University if Michigan Press, 2003. – Vol. 4.
334. Jenkins R. Accountability and the WTO Dispute-Settlement System // preprint for Governance and Democratic Legitimacy: Transnational, European and Multilevel Issues by Benz A. and Papandopoulos Y. (eds.) – London: Routledge, 2004.
335. Jung Youngjin. Modelling a WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism in an International Antitrust Agreement. An Impossible Dream? // Journal of World Trade. – 2000. – Vol. 34(1). – P. 89-110.
336. Kearns J. E., Charnovitz S. Adjudicating Compliance in the WTO:
Review of DSU Article 21.5 // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2002. – Vol. 5. –P. 331-352.
337. Komuro N., Vermulst E. Antidumping Disputes in the WTO: Navigating Dire Straits // Journal of World Trade – 1997. – Vol. 31. – P. 5-44.
338. Kufuor K.O. From the GATT to the WTO - The Developing Countries and the Reform of the Procedures for the Settlement of International Trade Disputes // Journal of World Trade – 1997. – Vol. 31(5). – P.117-147.
339. Lacarte-Muro J., Gappah P. Developing Countries and the WTO. Legal and Dispute Settlement System: a View from the Bench // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2000. – Vol. 3(3). – P. 395-401.
340. Lanye Zhu. The Effects of the WTO Dispute Settlement Panel and Appellate Body Reports: Is the Dispute Settlement Body Resolving Specific Disputes Only or Making Precedent at the Same Time? // Temple International & Comparative Law Journal. –2003. – Vol. 17:1. – P. 221-236.
341. Lida Keisuke. Is WTO Dispute Settlement Effective? // Global Governance. – 2004. – Vol.10. – P. 207-225.
342. Lindsey B., Griswold D., Groombridge M., Lukas, A. Seattle and Beyond. A WTO Agenda for the New Millennium // Trade Policy Analysis. – Washington DC: Centre for Trade Policy Studies. – 1999. – № 8. – P. 2-45.
343. MacKenzie D. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: War Is Easier, Cheaper, and Faster // Materials of the Annual Symposium: WTO – Yes or No? – Ottawa. – Nov. 2001.
344. Mansfield E., Reinhardt E. Multilateral Determinations of Regionalism: the Effects of GATT/WTO on the Formation of Preferential Trading Agreements //Address at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. – Washington DC, 2000.
345. Marceau G. Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Jurisdictions: The Relationships between the WTO Agreement and MEAs and other Treaties // Journal of World Trade. – 2001. – Vol. 35(6). – P. 1081-1131.
346. Marceau G. WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights // European Journal of International Law. – 2002. – Vol. 13(4). – P. 753-814.
347. Matibini P., Onyemaechi E. TRIPS Dispute Settlement Mechanism under WTO: Is it Negotiations or Adjudication? – Turin: The University of Turin, 2000.
348. Mavroidis P.C. Amicus Curiae Briefs Before the WTO: Much Ado About Nothing // European Integration and International Co-ordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus Dieter Ehlermann by Von Bogdandy A., Mavroidis P.C. and Menu Y. (eds). – Kluwer, 2002.
349. Mavroidis P.C. Remedies in the WTO Legal System: Between a Rock and a Hard Place // preprint for European Journal of International Law. – 2000. – Vol. 11(4) // www.ejil.org/journal/Vol11/No4/art1.pdf
350. Merrills J.G. International Dispute Settlement. – Cambridge, 2000.
351. Mosoti V. Does Africa Needs the WTO Dispute Settlement System? – Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, 2003.
352. Narsinghen H. Dispute Settlement Process under GATT/WTO: Diplomatic or Judicial Process? // Social Sciences and Humanities and Law & Management Research Journal. – 1999. – Vol. 2. – P. 97-110.
353. Nülle G.M. The WTO's Mercantilist Flaw // Ludwig Von Mises Institute Online Publications. – 27 September 2004. – http://www.mises.org/articles.aspx
354. Open Letter on Institutional Reforms in the WTO / WWF Int’l, IATP, ActionAid, FOE Int’l, CIEL, Oxfam Int’l. – Joint NGO Open Letter № 60. – October 2000.
355. Oxley A. The Challenge of Free Trade. – NY: St. Martin’s Press, 1990.
356. Palmeter D., Mavroidis P.C. Dispute Settlement in the World Trade Organization - Practice and Procedure. – Hague, Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1999.
357. Palmeter D. The WTO As a Legal System // Fordham International Law Journal. – Vol. 24 (1 & 2) – 2000. – P. 444-480.
358. Park Y. D., Umbricht G. C. WTO Dispute Settlement 1995-2000: A Statistical Analysis // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2001. – Vol. 4(1). – P. 213-230.
359. Parlin C.C. WTO Dispute Settlement: Are Sufficient Resources Being Devoted to Enable the System to Function Effectively // The International Lawyer – 1998. – Fall. – Р. 863-870.
360. Pauwelyn J. Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules. – Toward a More Collective Approach // American Journal of International Law. – 2000. – Vol.94, Issue 2. – P. 335-347.
361. Pauwelyn J. The Limits of Litigation: “Americanisation” and Negotiation in the Settlement of WTO Disputes // Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution. – 2003. –Vol.19:1. – P. 121-140.
362. Pauwelyn J. The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go? // American Journal of International Law. – 2001. – Vol.95. – P. 535-578.
363. Pere M. Non-Implementation of WTO Dispute Settlement and Liability Actions // Nordic Journal of Commercial Law. – 2004. – №1. – P. 1-61.
364. Petersmann E.-U. International Competition Rules for the GATT/WTO World Trade and Legal System // Journal of World Trade. – 1993. – Vol.27(6). – P. 35-72.
365. Petersmann E.-U. (ed.). International Trade Law and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. – London: Kluwer, 1999.
366. Petersmann E.-U. The GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. International Law, International Organizations and Dispute Settlement. – Den Haag: Kluwer Law International, 1997.
367. Quick R. Scope / Need for Strengthening WTO Rules, Especially Regarding Dispute Settlement, Institutional Issues, and Functioning of the System in Globalising World: National Europe Centre Paper № 59 // Materials of the Workshop “Australia and the European Union in the Multilateral Trade Round: Defining the Common Ground”. – Canberra, 2002.
368. Ragosta J. Unmasking the WTO: Access to the DSB System: Can the WTO DSB Live Up to the Moniker “World Trade Court?” – GWU School of Law, 2000 // preprint for Law and Policy International Business. – Vol. 31. – 2000. – www.law.georgetown.edu/journals/gjil/symp00/documents/ragosta.pdf
369. Ragosta J., Navin J., Zeldovich M. WTO Dispute Settlement: the System is Flawed and Must Be Fixed. – GWU School of Law, 2000 // preprint for International Lawyer. – Vol. 37. – 2003. – http://www.dbtrade.com/publications/wto_dispute_settlement_is_flawed.pdf
370. Razeen S. Whither the WTO? A Progress Report on the Doha Round. – London: Centre for Trade Policy Studies // Trade Policy Analysis – 2003. – Vol.23 – P. 1-36.
371. Recommendations for Ways Forward on Institutional Reform of the World Trade Organisation / Action Aid, CAFOD, Christian Aid, Consumers International, FIELD, Oxfam, RSPB, WDM. – Discussion Paper. – London, 1999.
372. Reif T.M., Florestal M. Revenge of the Push- Me, Pull-You: The Implementation Process under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding // The International Lawyer. – 1998. – Fall. – P.755-799.
373. Reinhardt E. Aggressive Multilateralism: The Determinants of GATT/WTO Dispute Initiation, 1948-1998. – Atlanta: Emory University, 2000.
374. Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) // Discussion Paper from the European Communities. – Brussels, October 21, 1998.
375. Rockwell Ll.H. WTO Forments a Trade War // Ludwig Von Mises Institute Online Publications. – 22 January 2002. – http://www.mises.org/articles.aspx
376. Roessler F. Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries under the WTO Dispute Settlement System. – Geneva: WTO, Advisory Centre of WTO Law, 2003.
377. Rosendorff P. Stability and Rigidity: Politics and Design of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Procedure. – LA: University of Southern California, 2005.
378. Sebenius J.K. Negotiation Arithmetic: Adding and Subtracting Issues and Parties // International Organization. – 1983. –Vol. 37 (2). – P. 281-316.
379. Sectoral Consultations on Dispute Settlement // Discussion Paper. – Canada: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, 1999.
380. Shaffer G. Weaknesses and Proposed Improvements to the WTO Dispute Settlement System: an Economic and Market-Oriented View // Materials of the Conference: WTO at Ten: a Look at the Appellate Body. – San Paulo, Brazil. – May 2005.
381. Shaping International Economic Law: An Interview with John H. Jackson // The Journal of International Institute (University of Michigan). – 1997. – Vol. 5(1). –http://www.umich.edu/~iinet/journal/vol5no1/jackson4.html
382. Shirzad F. The WTO Dispute Settlement System: Prospects for Reform // Published Materials of the “First Five Years of the WTO”, American BAR Association Conference. – Georgetown University Law Center. – January 2000.
383. Steger D.P. Key Procedural Issues: Resources; Comments // The International Lawyer. – 1998. – Fall. – P. 871-875.
384. Stewart T.P. Review of the Dispute Settlement Understanding: Operation of Panels // published materials of the “First Five Years of the WTO”, American BAR Association Conference. – Georgetown University Law Center. – January 2000.
385. Stoler A. L. Key Procedural Issues: Resources; Comments // The International Lawyer. – 1998. – Fall. – P. 878-880.
386. Sutherland, P. et al. The Future of the WTO. Addressing the Institutional Challenges in the New Millennium. Report by the Consultative Board to the Director General. – Geneva: WTO, 2005.
387. Sykes A.O. The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: Damages or Specific Performance?// New Directions in International Economic Law: Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson by Bronckers M., Quick R. (eds.) – The Hague: Kluwer International, 2000. – P. 347- 457.
388. Testimony of Lori Wallach Regarding the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Powerful Enforcement of Unbalanced, Extensive Regulations without Basic Due Process Protections. – Washington DC: Senate Finance Committee, 2000.
389. Testimony of Susan G. Esserman, General Council Office of the United States Trade Representative. – Washington DC: House International Relations, Economic Policy and Trade Subcommittee, 1998.
390. Trachtman J.P. Ubi Remedium, Ibi Jus at the WTO // Materials of the Conference on WTO Dispute Settlement and Developing Countries: Use, Implications, Strategies, Reforms. – University of Wisconsin. – May 2005.
391. Trebilcock M., Howse R. The regulation of international trade. – 2 ed. – London: Routledge, 1999.
392. Ujjwal Kumar. Dispute Settlement at WTO from Politics to Legality? // Briefing Paper. – CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics and Environment. –1999. – № 3. –P. 1-6.
393. Valles C., McGivern B. The Right to Retaliate under the WTO Agreement: The “Sequencing” Problem // Journal of World Trade. – 2000. – Vol. 34(2). – P. 63-84.
394. Van den Bossche P. The Doha Development Round Negatiations on the Dispute Settlement Understanding // Materials of the WTO Conference “New Agendas in the 21st Century”. – Taipei. – 2003.
395. Wang L. Are Trade Disputes Fairly Settled? // Journal of World Trade. – 1997. – Vol.31 – P. 59-72.
396. Weiler J.H.H. The Rule of Lawyers and Ethos of Diplomats: Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement // Harvard Jean Monnet Working Paper. – № 09/00. – MA. Cambridge: Harvard Law School, 2000.
397. Wolf M. What the World Needs from the Multilateral Trading System // The Role of the World Trade Organization in Global Governance by Sampson, G. (ed.). – Tokyo: United Nations Press, 2001. – P. 183-208.
398. Wolff A.Wm. Major Problems with WTO Dispute Settlement. // Published Remarks at the Global Business Dialogue Inc. – Washington DC, September 2002.
399. Wolff A.Wm. Reflections on WTO Dispute Settlement // Published Remarks for American BAR Association. – Warrenton: March 1998.
400. Wolff A.Wm. WTO Dispute Settlement and Trade Remedies // Presentation Before Committee to Support US Trade Laws, at Capitol Hill Symposium. – Washington DC, June 2002.
401. World Trade Organisation. 10 Benefits of the WTO Trading System. – Geneva: WTO, 2003.
402. World Trade Organisation and Commonwealth Parliamentary Association: Regional Workshops for Parliamentarians on the Multilateral Trading System. – Cape Town, Port-of-Spain: WTO - CPA, 2003.