Mathematical Formulas for Calculation of Newtonian Constant of Gravitation G (стр. 2 из 2)

As far as magnetic and electric constants do not have physical sense and their introduction is conditioned by only unit-s system selection, physical and astrophysical constants assume reduction to five primary superconstants. Primary, ontological status of universal superconstants allows referring superconstants to separate class of fundamental physical constants. To my mind, we should include to list of fundamental physical constant a new paragraph: "Universal superconstants":

Universal superconstants
Quantity	Symbol	Value	Unit
1	Fundamental quantum	hu	7,69558071(63) • 10-37	J s
2	Fundamental length	lu	2,817940285(31) • 10-15	m
3	Fundamental time	tu	0,939963701(11) • 10-23	s
4	Fine structure constant		7,297352533(27) • 10-3
5	Pi		3,141592653589...

Emphasizing of special paragraph "Universal superconstants" can be substantiating by following considerations. Five superconstants, included in superconstant basis, are primary constants. All other fundamental physical constants are compound constants and have secondary status. They can be deduced on the base of primary superconstants h_u, l_u, t_u,

, . We can deduce by analytic computation practically all major fundamental physical constants, using five superconstants. The author has received proper mathematical correlations for calculation of fundamental physical constant values, using superconstants [1, 2, 3, 4]. To my mind, these five universal superconstants can substitute a big list of electromagnetic, universal, atomic and nuclear constants and become a base of new physical theories of field, elementary particles and gravitation. More detailed information of superconstants you can find on sites:

Ontological status of superconstants h_u, l_u, t_u,

,

Five superconstants (h_u, l_u, t_u,

, ) are ontological basis of physical constants. It means, that physical constants originate from five superconstants. All of five superconstants are independent. It is impossible to get dimensionless superconstants, using dimensional superconstants. It is impossible to get dimensional superconstants, using dimensionless superconstants

The principles of superconstant sufficiency for physical constant are formulated in [1, 2]. The first principle of superconstant sufficiency is: "In the base of dimensional fundamental physical constants lie the constants of universal superconstants h_u, l_u, t_u,

, group". It is an equivalent formulation: "Values of dimensional fundamental physical constant can be received by calculation, using universal superconstants h_u, l_u, t_u, , ".

The second principle of superconstant sufficiency is: "In the base of all dimensionless fundamental physical constants lie two superconstants

and ". It is an equivalent formulation: "All dimensionless fundamental physical constants can be received by calculation, using two superconstants and ".

So, five superconstants h_u, l_u, t_u,

, are truly fundamental. They have ontological status. The conclusion is, that it was no reason to call other physical constants fundamental

Literature

2. Kosinov N. Five FundamentalConstants of Vacuum, Lying in the Base of allPhysicalLaws, Constants and Formulas // PhysicalVacuum and Nature. v 2000. -N4. - Я. 96 - 102.

4. Kosinov N. V., Kosinova Z. N. GENERAL CORRELATION AMONG FUNDAMENTAL PHYSICAL CONSTANTS // Journal of New Energy. v 2000. - Vol. 5. v ¦ 1. v Pp. 134 -135.

6. Peter J., Taylor M. N., Taylor B. N. CODATA Recommended Values of the FundamentalPhysicalConstants: 1998 // Reviews of Modern Physihs. v 2000. - Vol72. - No. 2. - www.physics.nist.gov/constants (Constants in the category "All constants")

10. Carter J. The Other Theory of Physics. - Washington, 1994.

12. John Baez. How Many Fundamental Constants Are There? - http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/constants.html

13. Johnson G. 10 Physics Questions to Ponder for a Millennium or Two // New York Times. v 2000. - Aug. 15

14. Gross D. Millennium Madness: Physics Problems for the Next Millenium. - Strings 2000 conference at University of Michigan. v 2000. - July 10-15