accurate example of how parents can safeguard their children without government
interference.
The question of the future of the Internet will be one to debate as we pass into the
next millennia, and will continue until an adequate means is reached. At the present, this
solution is nowhere in sight. Until further research is done and people are further
educated, censorship of the Internet cannot be achieved without limiting constitutional
guarantees.
Bibliography
Curtis, S. “Policing Cyberspace.” [Programs to block out pornography.]
Maclean’s, 19 Feb. 1996, pp. 56-7.
Dodd, J. “Who owns the Information?” PC Novice, May 1996, pp. 73-4.
Frankel, M. “Intellectual Popcorn for the Net.” The New York Times Magazine, 21 April 1996, pp. 26.
Gleick, J. “This is Sex?” The New York Times Magazine, 11 June 1995, pp. 26.
“Grappling with the Internet.” World Press Review, June 1996, pp. 14-5.
Gray, V.L. “Policing the Net.” Black Enterprise, Dec. 1996, pp. 26.
Jones, M. “Censorship in Cyberspace.” Home Office Computing, Nov. 1994, pp. 18.
Reid, C. “Supreme Court to Review.” Net anti-smut statute. Publishers Weekly, 16 Dec. 1996, pp. 11.
Robischon, N. “Software Filters: How Well Do They Work?” Time, 24 June 1996, pp. 57.
Yang, C. “Justice is Blind, but Net-Savvy.” Business Week, 1 July 1996, pp. 72+.
33f